Asset and vulnerability discovery
Network discovery, cloud inventory, and imports from Nessus, OpenVAS, and CSV build one catalogue of hardware, software, databases, cloud services, and suppliers. You cannot protect what you have not found.
NIST CSF 2.0 · ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · CIS v8
Half of all CVEs are rated critical. Under five per cent are ever exploited.
CyberRisk Protection finds every asset you own, works out which weaknesses attackers are actually using against assets that actually matter, and turns the result into a risk register your board can read and act on.
No card required to trial. Cancel at any time.
~40,000
CVEs published each year. No team can patch them all, and most tools respond by handing you the whole list sorted by severity.
<5%
Are ever exploited in the wild. Sorting by CVSS alone means spending most of your effort on the ninety-five per cent that will never matter.
The few
That are being used, against assets that carry your revenue or your regulated data. That is the list this product produces.
What it does
From an unknown estate to a defensible risk position
Four phases, each producing something the next one needs, and each producing evidence an auditor will accept.
Attack surface mapping
Shows the routes from an internet-facing entry point through to the systems that matter, ranked by how likely each hop is and what sits at the end of it.
Prioritisation that reflects reality
CISA KEV listing, EPSS exploit probability, exploit maturity, asset criticality, and network exposure combine into one score, with the reasoning shown beside it so an analyst can see why.
Risk in money, not adjectives
Loss event frequency multiplied by a three-point loss estimate, simulated ten thousand times. You get the expected annual loss and, more usefully, the bad-year figure that drives insurance and reserve decisions.
Accountability, not just analysis
Tasks routed to named owners with deadlines derived from your own SLA policy, and reporting on whether those deadlines are being met.
Compliance without the spreadsheet
Map a control once and satisfy the matching requirement in NIST CSF, ISO 27001, and CIS at the same time. Evidence is attached where the assessor will look for it.
The part most tools get wrong
Controls have diminishing returns, and the model says so
Two controls that each remove sixty per cent of the likelihood leave sixteen per cent, not zero. A tool that adds reductions together will happily tell you a critical risk has been eliminated by four half-implemented controls.
Here, controls combine multiplicatively, a control that failed its last test earns nothing whatever its recorded status says, and residual risk has a floor. The numbers stay uncomfortable when the position is uncomfortable, which is the only reason to have them.
The same principle applies to compliance scoring: a requirement marked not applicable is excluded from the calculation entirely, so scoping everything out produces a zero rather than a hundred.
Built for the conversation you actually have
Two audiences, one set of numbers
For the security team
- A queue sorted by what is genuinely dangerous, not by CVSS
- The reasoning behind every score, visible in the list
- SLA deadlines that tighten automatically for exposed assets
- Attack paths from the perimeter to the crown jewels
- A REST API and importers, so this fits your existing tooling
For the CISO and the board
- One posture score, with the trend that produced it
- Annualised loss exposure, and the ninety-fifth percentile year
- Which risks sit outside the appetite the board itself signed off
- Whether the money already spent on controls is working
- Framework scores with the evidence behind each claim
See it with a populated register, not an empty demo
Every trial starts with a worked example organisation: a real estate, genuine CVEs, a risk register with the numbers filled in, and a compliance assessment mid-flight. Delete it when you are ready to load your own.